New
fight arises at fort
Lines form over condos beside history
March 17, 2006
By BJ CORBITT |
The Brunswick News
Darien's Fort King George historical site could soon be neighbors
with condominiums, a possibility which is raising the hackles of
people who claim the development will compromise the area's history
and environment.
The McIntosh County Commission voted Tuesday to approve a request
to re-zone the property of Buena Pitts, adjacent to the fort, from
single-family to multi-dwelling residential.
Fort King George was founded as a British outpost in 1721 and served
as a focal point for ongoing struggles among the British, French,
Spanish and American Indians to control the land.
A three-story, 18-unit condominium complex is planned for the adjacent
property.
That idea doesn't sit well with Peyton Lingle of Townsend. He thinks
that condominiums rubbing shoulders with the fort will ruin the
Lowcountry charm of the area around the Darien River.
"It's an almost architectural arrogance," Lingle said. "They've
come up with a design that would look very good on Interstate 95
or up in Atlanta and want to put it next to the river."
Ad Poppell, a Darien lawyer who chairs the McIntosh County Friends
of the Fort chapter, said building close to the graves of British
soldiers buried on fort property is a bad idea. There is also the
chance that the property to be developed contains the remains of
Indians who were converted to Christianity by Spanish missionaries,
Poppell said.
"All development is not bad, but any time it's next to historic
sites we get concerned," Poppell said.
"It just seems such a pity to erect a building that close
to (the fort). You could literally throw something out your window
and have
it end up in a cemetery."
Geoffrey Branch, project manager for the proposed development,
said concerns about how the condominiums will impact the historic
nature
of the area will be taken into consideration.
"We've actually named this project The Battery and we're playing
with some different designs to stay in that time era," Branch said. "We
want to utilize the historic value of this area.
"I don't see where a (condominium) project is going to make
any of those 35,000 people who come through (the fort) each year
not go
there."
Branch said if the property turns out to be a burial ground, state
regulations will require that the development be conducted in such
a way as to not to disturb the remains.
"Obviously, anywhere we go in Coastal Georgia we're governed
by history," he
said. "We're taking every stride and effort to maintain the
integrity of the burial grounds. We're governed by laws, but a lot
of people don't want to listen to us when we say that."
There are other concerns, too.
Deborah Sheppard, executive director of the Altamaha Riverkeeper,
an environmental group based in Darien, is worried that the development
will compromise the water quality of the nearby river, primarily
through storm runoff.
Branch said the proposed development will be connected to the city
of Darien's drainage infrastructure.
Beyond all the detailed arguments, the most common root of disagreement
seems to be the potential impact the condominiums could have on
the fort's aesthetic presentation and historical ambiance.
"It's not hard to imagine how a three-story condo looking
out of a family neighborhood adjacent to a historic park isn't a
great idea," Sheppard
said.
|