Settlers Bluff requested this modification in October 2002 stating in
their project justification: "While the location of the site is good,
having adjacent marshes, the City of Darien and the Darien River within
walking distance, the site is extremely tight in terms having enough
land to develop enough units to sell plus required parking to justify
the economics of the project. In addition, not having the ability to
utilize the .4 acre permitted fill area would mean the loss of 2 condominium
buildings and the 24 units which would stop the project from being developed
and decrease the proposed tourism revenue that the City of Darien is
expecting from the proposed joint venture project. Marketing results
indicate that the access to the adjacent Darien River clearly is the
amenity that makes the economics of the proposed project justified for
the developers. In addition, not having access to the adjacent Darien
River for the condominium owners/guests, the developers would not be
able to sell the units at the price necessary to cover their cost plus
a reasonable profit which clearly makes this project a water dependent
activity."
In a November 2002 letter, at the request of ARK and others, the S o
u t h e r n Environmental Law Center (SELC) presented extensive comments
urging the Corps to deny the modification request. We argued that the
use of the marsh fill site for residential condominiums could not be
justified since the project was not water dependent and that alternatives
existed for residential development that avoided the use of filled wetlands
for nonwater dependent uses.
The SELC letter stated: In evaluating the modification request,
the Corps must weigh the benefits of the project in addressing the
needs and welfare of the people against reasonably foreseeable detriments.
In this case, the proposed modification would change the project from
a public, full-service marina to a private condominium complex. This
change removes the public need found for the original project. The
specific findings of public interest by the Corps in evaluating the
original permit application for the project stated that "the marina
will serve the fishing and boating needs of the public; including marine
repair and maintenance." In the current proposal, none of these public
benefits exist.
A marina was permitted for the site in l990 but the Corps even denied
a request from the City of Darien to put a picnic shelter on the site.
The Corps said the picnic shelter did not meet the standards for a "water
dependent use" which is required by the Clean Water Act for building
on a filled wetland site. The former wetland area was filled under the
permit for marina parking, which did meet the water dependent use clause.
A dozen years later, the lure of economic development created a questionable
project built on soggy ground. Perhaps the project will serve as a reminder
that wetlands hold water even when they are filled with dirt and should
be avoided for construction projects.
Other information on this project is available in past ARK newsletters
and on the ARK website at www.altamahariverkeeper.org. |